The trap, part II

The hardest part.

Part I is here. This is Part II and if you have the time, try right-clicking the links I provide here.

Whoever I talk to - or read from - it’s the same tune: The world is going insane, what’s gonna happen next, etc. Well, let’s put some names to it.

Socially, this is a breakdown¹.

Economically, this is bankruptcy.

Politically, this is a global communist coup.

Civilization-wise, this is unadulterated decadence.

And, what do you call it when a lot of people commit a lot of crimes - theft, treason, destruction, murder - and never face the consequences or even get rewarded while a resistance movement tries to hold things together? Ah yes…

War.

Since it’s happening all over the world, I think it’s even reasonable to call it WWIII.

I also think it’s a wakeup call. So let’s wake up, folks.

All of this didn’t happen overnight. The world was already insane four years ago, and in fact long before that. It’s just showing more clearly now.

How did we get here, and more importantly, how do we get out? Let’s start with the most obvious scam of them all.

Politics

“Masculine republics give way to feminine democracies, and feminine democracies give way to tyranny”

- Aristotle

That quote just about sums it up but let’s take a closer look, starting with democracy. Everyone loves democracy and we’re being told it’s in dire straits. What is democracy, anyway? Warning: This is going to be boring - it’s politics - so those familiar with the subject can skip the whole chapter. Don't expect Wikipedia-grade stuff here, either - I'm a high school dropout so what do I know? I’m writing this for, well, other high school dropouts.

As opposed to constitutional republics (the US) or constitutional kingdoms (the UK), whose founding principles govern both the people and the rulers, democracy is supposedly when the laws come directly from the people or more likely through their representatives. There are tons of web pages about this but I’ll sum it up this way: Daddy asks the kids how he should run the family, and of course, what they want is free candy for everyone - yay! happiness and freedom. What's not to like? For starters, given the self-serving tendencies of human nature, it doesn’t work all that well. It’s a bit of a mess, really. So democracy has to come up with common goals - for the, ahem, “common good” - which it does through propaganda. Depending on the prevailing circumstances, propaganda will tell you what’s good for you and what you need to worry about (topics that can switch from one category to another almost overnight): human rights, women’s rights (now a relic from the time when women existed), minority rights, white supremacy, the Climate™, terrorism, pandemics, inflation, Russia and all sorts of crises du jour, so that when it’s time to vote, you can make an “informed decision”. You know, like with vaccines.

Democracies also need a bit of stability and social peace, so they resort to various psyops to push people around and if that’s still not enough, violence and repression. The fact that all this is reminiscent of communism is no coincidence, nor is the fact that countries with "Democratic" in their name are communist dictatorships: they’re joined at the hip. If you ask me, democracy is a fantasy world for kids where the purpose is to seize/control assets by political means. Governments take what they want and then use it as they see fit anyway, but they kindly ask for your consent first. They call it voting. As in, hey kids, do you want to take a bath or a shower²? Of course, in Western democracies, you'd never be the wiser as long as there's an abundance of affordable food and goods on offer. Well…

We are clearly at the end of this rope³ - our generous Western democratic economies are all but destroyed by debt and the danger of egalitarianism and collectivism is now rearing its ugly head⁴. So, as you’ve heard, people are now turning to the "far-right" - a dictatorship by any other name - which is supposed to mitigate the damage done by the "left" - democracy - in an age-old game of musical chairs. That's the theory. Let's leave aside the merits of one or the other and ask the question: Will it work?

So what’s a dictatorship - I mean a far-right dictatorship, if there even is such a thing? It doesn’t purport to bring happiness or freedom to anyone, nor does it. It brings order - and I’d say order is badly needed at the moment and a lot of people feel that way. Dictatorships achieve stability and social peace through an authoritarian leadership - Daddy has had enough of the sorry mess his family has become so he’s taking back control. All you have to do is find a “far-right” leader and vote him in. Well, not so fast. I doubt that any electoral process has a chance of bringing such a ruler to power because firstly, it's too bitter a pill to swallow. You know, soldiers on every corner. Knocking on doors at 5am. Firing squads. So your "far-right" politician is usually all soundbites that have little to do with the real thing. Also, any far-right proponent would acknowledge that democracy - and therefore elections - are a danger. Far-right regimes can thus only come about through coups, usually military ones, not through elections. You can’t "vote for the far-right" because there are no "far-right politicians" to vote for: it's a contradiction in terms. Despite the subtext of Trump being a "threat to democracy" - which really means he’s actually going to drive communism and all its shenanigans out of your constitutional republic - he’s not a dictator and as such, he can’t. What’s more, for reasons I’ll come back to, the far and few between "far-right" regimes have always failed spectacularly, giving way to new democracies, that in time became toxic ones - which brings us back to our game of musical chairs.

Some people argue that “feminine” democracy come about by leveraging women’s instincts for conformity - you can read all about it here, here, here or anywhere on the guy’s blog. That may be true, but it’s also a double-edged sword. Women may harbour a streak of conformity in them but they’re not that stupid. Eventually they realize that they’re being played and that their liberators are not their friends (<you really should read this). I meet (and read) more and more “far-right” female “warriors”, i.e. common-sense ladies with good brains and big hearts, and great mums, too. Hey, I married one.

Our communist masters have now turned to the most misguided members of the younger generation, the climate change angst-ridden ones, whose neural pathways have been forever destroyed by screen exposure (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, amongst thousands of other pieces) rendering them incapable even to sponge up what passes for education nowadays, their self-respect and moral compass derailed by TikTok exposure - all damage exarcerbated by the lockdowns. They’re “transitioning” as many of them as possible into a state of permanent weakness and dependence on the State. In turn, a growing number of those poor souls are now realizing what they’ve signed up for and they’re not very happy about it. Suicides, violence and big lawsuits are on the way.

I doubt that the current weaponization of the migrants will last very long either. They will eventually realize that they’re being played. They really should. There are peoples I wouldn’t want to engage with. I’m afraid of Americans, I’m scared of the Poles but I’m terrified of the Britons. Seriously. And I married one, too.

The left will, of course, justify mass migration with stories of climate change, political or war refugees. Some of this is true but mostly, these people are being brought in to compensate for failing demographics and a shrinking workforce - slavery and human trafficking by any other name, both historically right up the left’s alley - at the behest of the financial network, which needs stable demographics and low-wage jobs, and for the left’s own ideological purposes: the violent destruction of traditional cultures. They get a helping hand from the tech department for surveillance, fear-mongering, censorship and mind control, from spooks for the sowing of chaos and division and from the order-following police force for cracking down on anyone who dares to voice any concern whatsoever. Of course.

Now what would the "far-right" do in this particular case? Since they are supposed to be the repository of natural laws, as opposed to ideology, they would probably tackle the demographic problem as they have always done, by incentivizing a higher birth rate (currently in the dumps in the First World) and eventually re-criminalizing abortion - something that most politicians will not touch with a ten-foot pole. If they ever had to resort to imported labour, they would make sure it was well contained, because, just to be clear, immigration is not a problem per se. The problem is when migrants take advantage of the system's weaknesses and/or organize themselves into mobs and politicians use them for their own ends - a typical method of the left. This is what the right-wing President De Gaulle averted with Algerian workers in France back in the day - one of the many reasons why there were dozens of CIA-orchestrated assassination attempts against him⁵.

Now just for a much-needed entertainment break, you can watch this brief excerpt of a fictionalized version of one such attempt from Fred Zinneman’s excellent movie, “The Jackal”, and see if the timely last-second head-ducking moment reminds you of anything. It seems Langley’s entertainment department has been plundering films for ideas on how to build a heroic image for their new performer - a formerly rather shady businessman.

Let’s ask Catherine Austin Fitts and John Titus how they feel about the guy:

So do you think Peter Thiel is a man for the task and Trump an American De Gaulle?

And what about Bobby?

Ok, Bobby. Bitcoin. And land grab, which should come as no surprise from this guy.

As I’ve said before, no political solution. On stage discussions, backstage corruption.

At best, they’re rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic, but more likely, they’re stuffing the last remaining lifeboats with the cutlery and rowing hard to avoid being capsized by the waves - while the band plays on. The game of musical chairs is over. They won't tell you, so I will: politics is reaching its limits, and unfortunately so is the economy. Both are becoming the opposite of what they should be - and it's all to do with concepts.

Concepts

All political systems work perfectly well on paper and fail miserably in real life because they are concepts and trying to apply concepts to reality can only work so much. You end up with corruption, backlash, chaos and eventually a complete breakdown of society. Concepts and modelization have killed science, politics, economics and of course, medicine, just as agriculture was once destroyed by Lysenkoism. Excerpt:

More than 3,000 mainstream biologists were dismissed or imprisoned, and numerous scientists were executed in the Soviet campaign to suppress scientific opponents. The president of the Soviet Agriculture Academy, Nikolai Vavilov, who had been Lysenko's mentor, but later denounced him, was sent to prison and died there, while Soviet genetics research was effectively destroyed. Research and teaching in the fields of neurophysiology, cell biology, and many other biological disciplines were harmed or banned.

Now does this ring a bell?

Once again, how did we get here? Bear with me, we’re going back in time.

It all really began with the killing of God, using the same method: they made God a concept, turning His immanence into a yes or no question that had no right to be, and then conveniently pretended it could not be answered - which is the reason why it was asked in the first place. They cemented the fraud by altering your innate perception of God, including the perception of your own conscience - what the Christians rightly call the Holy Spirit - with a whole series of dialectical and rethorical frauds such as phenomenology and theosophy. On top of these, they piled on all sorts of inane scientific explanations about the universe - the Big Bang and evolution being the two most devastatingly stupid. In short, they replaced conscience with Science™ - or at least the kind of gobbledygook that passes for such nowadays. For that particular purpose, they turned the whole scientific process, whose former goal was to derive concepts from observing the natural world, into its opposite: trying to apply hypothetical and more importantly, mathematical concepts and models to the natural world. As you may remember, that's how they tackled Covid. You should really, really listen to that guy - Jobst Landgrebe - because he clearly points to that specific issue as the way in which science has been derailed and turned into scientism. By the way, he’s a Catholic. Just sayin’.

They killed the economy in the same way with Keynesianism - another failed concept they piled on the real problem, the usury- and fractional reserve-based Ponzi scheme. They used the same method to maintain their central banking system with increasing collateral damages from their destructive countermeasures - from insane money printing to quantitative easing - and then to generate even more worthless value through their derivatives bubble. As Michael Snyder put it in 2010:

So exactly what are "derivatives"? Well, derivatives are basically financial instruments whose value depends upon or is derived from the price of something else. A derivative has no underlying value of its own. It is essentially a side bet. Today, the world financial system has been turned into a giant casino where bets are made on just about anything you can possibly imagine, and the major Wall Street banks make a ton of money from it. The system is largely unregulated (the new "Wall Street reform" law will only change this slightly) and it is totally dominated by the big international banks.

So, a fiction on top of a fiction, and you can now add the Bitcoin bubble to the list of ways they’re using to buy up real assets. That is, yours. Your houses, your industries, your infrastructures, your land, your country.

Your future.

By now the Bank of International Settlement has taken complete control of the entire banking ecosystem and has set up its own water-tight rules so that it can do exactly what it wants with the global economy without any accountability - just like Pharma has done with vaccines - and then claim all the land and commodities on the planet as collateral. If/when this happens, the lockdowns will look like a dress rehearsal - which they probably were. And it’s not really new, is it? This whole civilization is a reflection of their investment and all your options for freedom and happiness have always been within that framework only. Both are concepts, too, thrown at you left and right, literally, that have you at each other’s throat for a seat in the lifeboat while the ship is sinking. It’s time to throw all those useless concepts overboard and find solutions.

Real ones.

And that will be the topic of Part III.

1. Charles Hugh Smith calls it a social recession. I agree.

2. For those who don’t have kids or don’t know the trick, this is how you get a child who doesn't want to wash to do it.

3. “The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater.” - Frank Zappa.

4. The link will send you to a very, very good article by David Ziffer, which I’ve translated for the French speaking readers of my blog.

5. A goal the CIA regime-change operation known as "May 68" - a coloured revolution - ultimately achieved by ousting him.