Are you far-right?

Without even knowing it?

You may have heard the joke that “far right” stands for anyone to the right of Trotsky. It started out as a joke, but it did not take long for it to come true. It's very hard to make a joke these days, because no matter how outrageous you try to make it sound, the reality quickly gets worse. And this particular far-right thing has got a lot worse recently.

Of course, “far-right” is just one in a long list of slanders - curses, you might say - that are hurled at you, no matter how absurd. So you can be called an anti-Semite, a racist and a right-wing homophobe all at once, even if you're a Jewish, gay, black, registered Democrat¹. All you have to do is express a slightly different opinion - on illegal immigration, for example - from the official orthodoxy. In fact, just calling yourself a man/woman is enough to unleash such a torrent of hatred - which, of course, isn't hatred when it's directed at you, because intolerant people are not to be tolerated. You don't even have to say anything, your very existence as a human being is a threat to the common good. At least that's what Covid told us. Right?

That kind of weird use of "far-right" is not exactly new. I even remember seeing it used for - brace yourself - breastfeeding mothers. I'm not making this up, I was into promoting breastfeeding at the time - my three sons were breastfed for years, so we must have been a major threat to society.

Now it looks like far-right is on its way to replace all the other name-calling pieces of Newspeak. It stands for all of the above, and it's also the new white supremacist, the new climate skeptic, the new Trumper, the new conspiracy theorist - I hope I'm not forgetting anything. And of course, it's the new anti-vaxx.

But my dear probably far-right, ghoulish, blood-thirsty readers, that's not all. Far from it. Let's look at two ongoing examples.

You really have to wonder why Western governments would be so intent on sending so many Ukrainian males to their death, in a war that obviously, from what I'm told, cannot be won. Well, let me tell you one thing or two. One aspect that is hardly ever discussed about Ukrainians is, wouldn't you know it, their staunch opposition to immigration, which they had kept down to near zero before the time of the Special Operation. Of course you can call it racism - actually, you must, they are Ukronazis, right? - but they naively see it as safeguarding their gene pool². If you've ever witnessed Ukranian female beauty, it's not very hard to understand why. Of course that does not justify years of violence towards the Eastern Russian inhabitants in any way, but that's just the way it is - and that's the way it apparently cannot be. A second strange coincidence is that the vast majority of the men sent to the war front are peasants - supposedly because urban men would not stand the harsh war conditions. Well, that’s kind of reminiscent of a former war of attrition in which scores of peasants were uselessly slaughtered, doesn't it? You know, WWI. France. Verdun. The trenches.

Speaking of farmers, you cannot have missed the vast current concerted effort to drive them off their generational family-owned lands. They are a threat to the planet because cows.

So these people essentially want to retain their ethnicity and the land that goes with it - very basic tenets of life itself. Is that "far-right"?

As you can see for yourself, the common thread to all those supposedly far-right people is self-preservation. This of course does not fit into the new paradigm - the one with "too many people" in it - that you will get from every single neo-Bolshevik big investors mouthpiece - the Greens, the World Economic Forum, the IMF and other various assorted pieces of human shite. The age-old wet dream they're now openly pushing on you - as if it wasn't clear enough - being depopulation.

So let’s see if I understand them right, if you're still alive in 2024, you're far-right? Even more damning, you could be in the way of a planetary land grab, just like the Aborigines were, according to Ambrose Bierce:

"Persons of little worth found cumbering the soil of a newly discovered country. They soon cease to cumber; they fertilize."

So, far-right savages, please make way, as we have business to do here. And if you don't, we have ways to make you...

Which brings us to England³.

I really can't understand why this Starmer gentleman would be so upset about the far-right, when, as a politician who has only the best interests of his country at heart, he has to deal, if only to be handed his marching orders, with the most far-right people to ever walk the Earth: the financial network. Actually, not only would Mr Starmer have no reason to fear them, he should indeed be very grateful: they created him, and all the people like him. Communists, brought to you by the Bank. For communism is actually not so much a doctrine as it is a shortcut - and a very useful one at that. With communism, you don't have to go through all the trouble of capitalism - enslaving children in the poorest parts of the world to ensure the well-being of Western consumers, from whom you have to find ever new ways to steal back by selling them stuff they don't need. With communism, you can enslave your own population directly, so you can steal directly from them and if need be - which is often - you can determine what kind of traits are unacceptable - like, being a land-owning peasant - and dispose of those who do not give complete satisfaction. Easy as pie. The Bank does this through wars, as we've just seen, through revolutions, like the French one or the Great Leap Forward or whatever, or through remote-controlled regime change, like the one that put the German National Socialist⁴ Workers Party in power.

And then, first law of assassination, you kill the killers. For example, you call the most commited Party member a counterrevolutionary petty bourgeois and have him disappeared or considerably shortened, or you can arrange a military confrontation with Russia - that always works - and eventually have the US army come in and finish the job. When it comes to playing one side off against the other, the possibilities are endless.

What is happening now in Britain, where the police and the judiciary are cracking down on their own citizens, has a sense of déjà vu. So I suggest that those who are now empowered and entitled as "agents of change" really should take a lesson from history and realise sooner rather than later that once they have outlived their usefulness they will be the first to go. Nobody really likes a traitor, and bankers, as the most ruthless and demanding traitors to the human species, know very well who not to trust. Just ask Yuri Bezmenov or read Orwell's 1984 what happens to these tools: even - in fact, especially - the most dedicated Party underling is a threat to the Great Chairman/Lider Maximo/whatever. Or let's hear it for a prominent globalist and serial warmonger:

“Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”

And that goes for highly-trained professionals, so just imagine what he’d think of you. I’m just worried about you, guys.

I'm also a little worried about Mr Starmer, who kind of reminds me of those Josef Stalin once thought wiser to dispose of. It would be a shame to lose such a fine specimen of the political class. I hope everything turns out well for him. I really do. I hope it goes well for the British law enforcement agents, too. Otherwise they would at least have shown their true dedication to the Cause, and could not be suspected of far-right activism from such a passé and deplorable attitude as stupidly clinging to life.

1. “If you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black”, said Joe.

2. Such a quaint idea in this mRNA time and age.

3. I could have picked France, the Netherlands or a dozen of different countries but let’s stick to the news of the day, shall we?

4. Socialist. Like in, socialist.